logo
/
最新消息
所属分类概要描述: 1
小i机器人再次起诉苹果siri专利侵权,索赔100亿元!
小i机器人再次起诉苹果siri专利侵权,索赔100亿元!
小i机器人成立于2001年,工商登记主体为上海智臻智能网络科技股份有限公司,是一家人工智能技术公司,专注于基于多语种自然语言处理、深度语义交互、语音识别和机器学习等人工智能核心技术。8月3日,小i机器人在其微博中宣称,已经正式向上海市高级人民法院提起诉讼,要求苹果公司停止Siri(智能助理)专利侵权,包括但不限于,要求苹果公司停止制造、使用、许诺销售、销售、进口侵犯ZL200410053749.9发明专利权的产品,并暂计索赔金额100亿元(人民币)。 据悉,这并非双方首次专利纠纷,早在2012年6月21日,小i机器人在上海市第一中级人民法院对苹果公司提起专利侵权,涉案专利即ZL200410053749.9。作为回应,苹果公司于11月19日向国家知识产权局专利复审委员会提出申请,请求宣告小i机器人上述专利无效;2013年9月3日,专利复审委员会做出决定,维持上述专利权有效;苹果公司不服复审决定,向北京市第一中级人民法院提起行政诉讼,请求撤销审查决定;2014年7月8日,法院依法判定维持审查决定;苹果公司上诉至北京市高级人民法院,北京高院改判撤销专利复审委的决定,要求对涉案发明专利权重新做出审查决定;小i机器人不服二审判决,向最高人民法院申请再审,2020年6月28日,最高人民法院发布行政判决书,以终审判决程序确认小i机器人ZL200410053749.9专利权的有效性。 对于新一轮的诉讼,小i机器人并没有透露更多的细节。小i机器人创始人、董事长兼CEO袁辉表示:“作为一个科技从业者,我非常尊重苹果公司,他们的产品和服务给全世界带来了很多价值和体验。但是,消费者购买的每一个苹果产品,都是付了钱的。反过来,苹果也要尊重创新,使用了我们的专利,也需要向我们支付合理费用。”可以看出,小i机器人的最终目的并非要禁止苹果公司销售相关的产品,而是希望获得合理的专利费用。涉案专利申请于2004年,在2009年获得授权。苹果公司于2010年收购Siri.Inc,在2011年12月6日,首次推出搭载了Siri系统的产品,获得了不错的市场反响。智能语音产业是以技术为导向的新兴产业,据有关资料显示,2018年中国的智能语音产业市场规模为48.6亿元,2021年将突破100亿元的市场规模。小i机器人提出100亿元的赔偿金额,尚不明确其其具体的计算依据,但该案件的审理必定是个漫长而受到广泛关注的过程。
查看详情
小i机器人成立于2001年,工商登记主体为上海智臻智能网络科技股份有限公司,是一家人工智能技术公司,专注于基于多语种自然语言处理、深度语义交互、语音识别和机器学习等人工智能核心技术。8月3日,小i机器人在其微博中宣称,已经正式向上海市高级人民法院提起诉讼,要求苹果公司停止Siri(智能助理)专利侵权,包括但不限于,要求苹果公司停止制造、使用、许诺销售、销售、进口侵犯ZL200410053749.9发明专利权的产品,并暂计索赔金额100亿元(人民币)。 据悉,这并非双方首次专利纠纷,早在2012年6月21日,小i机器人在上海市第一中级人民法院对苹果公司提起专利侵权,涉案专利即ZL200410053749.9。作为回应,苹果公司于11月19日向国家知识产权局专利复审委员会提出申请,请求宣告小i机器人上述专利无效;2013年9月3日,专利复审委员会做出决定,维持上述专利权有效;苹果公司不服复审决定,向北京市第一中级人民法院提起行政诉讼,请求撤销审查决定;2014年7月8日,法院依法判定维持审查决定;苹果公司上诉至北京市高级人民法院,北京高院改判撤销专利复审委的决定,要求对涉案发明专利权重新做出审查决定;小i机器人不服二审判决,向最高人民法院申请再审,2020年6月28日,最高人民法院发布行政判决书,以终审判决程序确认小i机器人ZL200410053749.9专利权的有效性。 对于新一轮的诉讼,小i机器人并没有透露更多的细节。小i机器人创始人、董事长兼CEO袁辉表示:“作为一个科技从业者,我非常尊重苹果公司,他们的产品和服务给全世界带来了很多价值和体验。但是,消费者购买的每一个苹果产品,都是付了钱的。反过来,苹果也要尊重创新,使用了我们的专利,也需要向我们支付合理费用。”可以看出,小i机器人的最终目的并非要禁止苹果公司销售相关的产品,而是希望获得合理的专利费用。涉案专利申请于2004年,在2009年获得授权。苹果公司于2010年收购Siri.Inc,在2011年12月6日,首次推出搭载了Siri系统的产品,获得了不错的市场反响。智能语音产业是以技术为导向的新兴产业,据有关资料显示,2018年中国的智能语音产业市场规模为48.6亿元,2021年将突破100亿元的市场规模。小i机器人提出100亿元的赔偿金额,尚不明确其其具体的计算依据,但该案件的审理必定是个漫长而受到广泛关注的过程。
Hualu-Hengsheng may compensate 80 million for patent infringement!
Hualu-Hengsheng may compensate 80 million for patent infringement!
Shandong Hualu-Hengsheng Chemical Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Hualu-Hengsheng") is a company with fertilizers, chemicals, thermal power, and gas as its main business. On July 1, Hualu-Hengsheng announced that at the end of 2016, Sichuan Golden-Elephant Sincerity Chemical Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Golden-Elephant Sincerity") and Beijing Yejing Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Yejing Technology") sued Hualu-Hengsheng, Ningbo Research & Design Institute of Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Ningbo Institute of Chemical Industry"), Ningbo Fareast Chemical Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Fareast Group") and Yin Mingda (former chief engineer of Golden-Elephant Sincerity) for patent infringement, the patents involved are Patent Applications No. CN201110108644.9 and No. CN201010216437.0. The two plaintiffs alleged that the four defendants cooperated in the engineering design, manufacturing and construction of the melamine project, and caused infringement damage to them. Recently, the High People’s Court of Guangdong Province ruled that Hualu-Hengsheng immediately stopped infringing on the patent rights of the melamine production method owned by Golden-Elephant Sincerity and its subsidiary Yejing, and compensated the two plaintiffs for economic losses and reasonable rights protection costs totaling 80 million yuan in the first trial. During the trial of the case, the plaintiffs claimed that the contents of the "Safety Evaluation Report" and "Design Article" submitted by Hualu-Hengsheng to the relevant safety supervision department for record objectively reflected the technical scheme of the melamine project involved in the case, and it could be concluded that the four defendants had infringed on their patent rights. Hualu-Hengsheng argued that the content of the patent documents is different from the technical scheme of its melamine project, and the relevant technical scheme of the melamine project is its trade secret, so Hualu-Hengsheng clearly refused to conduct on-site inspection in the court hearing. When the court staff went to Hualu-Hengsheng factory for evidence preservation according to law, Hualu-Hengsheng took various measures to obstruct the court staff from performing their official duties and refused them to enter the project site. The behavior was judged by the court as seriously hindering civil litigation and decided to fine Hualu-Hengsheng 800,000 yuan. Evidence preservation is an important procedure in civil litigation. If the scope of evidence to be preserved involves trade secrets, the relevant right holder may request the court to take reasonable confidentiality measures. Hualu-Hengsheng's refusal to preserve evidence on site by the court had adverse effects on itself. Hualu-Hengsheng also announced that in October 2011, it signed a contract with Ningbo Institute of Chemical Industry and Fareast Group, which agreed that Ningbo Institute of Chemical Industry and Fareast Group guaranteed that all the proprietary technology and related technical materials provided by them were legally held. If a third party accused the project of Hualu-Hengsheng of infringement, the two companies in Ningbo shall be responsible for the negotiation and assume full responsibility which would have an important impact on the business activities of Hualu-Hengsheng. Hualu-Hengsheng has appealed to the Supreme People's Court against the judgment of the first trial, and the administrative litigation on the invalidation decision of the patent involved is still in progress.
查看详情
Shandong Hualu-Hengsheng Chemical Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Hualu-Hengsheng") is a company with fertilizers, chemicals, thermal power, and gas as its main business. On July 1, Hualu-Hengsheng announced that at the end of 2016, Sichuan Golden-Elephant Sincerity Chemical Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Golden-Elephant Sincerity") and Beijing Yejing Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Yejing Technology") sued Hualu-Hengsheng, Ningbo Research & Design Institute of Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Ningbo Institute of Chemical Industry"), Ningbo Fareast Chemical Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Fareast Group") and Yin Mingda (former chief engineer of Golden-Elephant Sincerity) for patent infringement, the patents involved are Patent Applications No. CN201110108644.9 and No. CN201010216437.0. The two plaintiffs alleged that the four defendants cooperated in the engineering design, manufacturing and construction of the melamine project, and caused infringement damage to them. Recently, the High People’s Court of Guangdong Province ruled that Hualu-Hengsheng immediately stopped infringing on the patent rights of the melamine production method owned by Golden-Elephant Sincerity and its subsidiary Yejing, and compensated the two plaintiffs for economic losses and reasonable rights protection costs totaling 80 million yuan in the first trial. During the trial of the case, the plaintiffs claimed that the contents of the "Safety Evaluation Report" and "Design Article" submitted by Hualu-Hengsheng to the relevant safety supervision department for record objectively reflected the technical scheme of the melamine project involved in the case, and it could be concluded that the four defendants had infringed on their patent rights. Hualu-Hengsheng argued that the content of the patent documents is different from the technical scheme of its melamine project, and the relevant technical scheme of the melamine project is its trade secret, so Hualu-Hengsheng clearly refused to conduct on-site inspection in the court hearing. When the court staff went to Hualu-Hengsheng factory for evidence preservation according to law, Hualu-Hengsheng took various measures to obstruct the court staff from performing their official duties and refused them to enter the project site. The behavior was judged by the court as seriously hindering civil litigation and decided to fine Hualu-Hengsheng 800,000 yuan. Evidence preservation is an important procedure in civil litigation. If the scope of evidence to be preserved involves trade secrets, the relevant right holder may request the court to take reasonable confidentiality measures. Hualu-Hengsheng's refusal to preserve evidence on site by the court had adverse effects on itself. Hualu-Hengsheng also announced that in October 2011, it signed a contract with Ningbo Institute of Chemical Industry and Fareast Group, which agreed that Ningbo Institute of Chemical Industry and Fareast Group guaranteed that all the proprietary technology and related technical materials provided by them were legally held. If a third party accused the project of Hualu-Hengsheng of infringement, the two companies in Ningbo shall be responsible for the negotiation and assume full responsibility which would have an important impact on the business activities of Hualu-Hengsheng. Hualu-Hengsheng has appealed to the Supreme People's Court against the judgment of the first trial, and the administrative litigation on the invalidation decision of the patent involved is still in progress.
华鲁恒升涉嫌专利侵权一审判赔8000万,因举证妨碍被罚80万!
华鲁恒升涉嫌专利侵权一审判赔8000万,因举证妨碍被罚80万!
山东华鲁恒升化工股份有限公司(以下简称“华鲁恒升”)是一家以化肥、化工、热电、气体为主营业务的公司,于2002年6月在上海证券交易所挂牌上市(股票代码600426)。7月1日,华鲁恒升发布公告称,2016年底,四川金象赛瑞化工股份有限公司(以下简称“金象赛瑞”)、北京烨晶科技有限公司(以下简称“烨晶科技”)以专利侵权为由起诉华鲁恒升、宁波市化工研究设计院有限公司(以下简称“宁波化工院”)、宁波远东化工集团有限公司(以下简称“远东集团”)和自然人尹明大(金象赛瑞原总工程师),涉案专利为第ZL201110108644.9号、第ZL201010216437.0号发明专利,两原告诉称四被告共同合作实施三聚氰胺项目的工程设计、制造、施工,并共同合作使用加压气相淬冷法工艺方法、组合式换热器及流化床反应器设备,侵犯了金象赛瑞发明专利专用权,给金象赛瑞造成了侵权损害。近日,广东省高级人民法院一审判决华鲁恒升立即停止侵犯金象赛瑞及其子公司烨晶科技拥有的三聚氰胺生产方法专利权,并赔偿原告经济损失及合理维权费用共计8000万元。 涉案专利主要涉及节能节资型气相淬冷法蜜胺生产系统及其工艺和组合式换热器及流化床反应器,都是加压气相淬冷法三聚氰胺生产相关技术。据金象赛瑞方面报道,涉案专利是由金象赛瑞联合烨晶科技的技术团队投入近亿元,历时10余年研发成功,目前在三聚氰胺生产技术上仍属于较高水平。 在该案的审理过程中,原告主张,华鲁恒升向有关安监部门提交备案的《安评报告》、《设计专篇》记载内容客观反映了涉案三聚氰胺项目实施的技术方案,可以认定四被告侵犯其专利权。华鲁恒升认为,记载的内容与其三聚氰胺项目实施的技术方案不同,三聚氰胺项目有关技术方案是其商业秘密,在庭审中明确表示拒绝进行现场勘验。法院依法到华鲁恒升厂区进行证据保全时,华鲁恒升采取多种手段妨碍法院工作人员执行公务,拒绝其进入项目现场,该行为被法院判定严重妨害民事诉讼,决定处罚80万元。证据保全是民事诉讼中的一项重要制度。在保全的证据范围涉及商业秘密的情况下,相关权利人可请求采取合理保密措施,华鲁恒升拒绝法院现场证据保全的行为,会对自己产生不利的影响。 华鲁恒升还在公告中称,在2011年10月其与宁波化工研究院、宁波远东共同签订合同,约定宁波化工研究院和宁波远东保证其提供的一切专有技术及相关技术资料系合法持有者,如果发生第三方指控华鲁恒升的项目侵权,由宁波这两家公司负责交涉并承担全部责任,8000万的判赔和80万的处罚最终有谁承担将会对华鲁恒升的经营活动产生重要的影响。目前华鲁恒升不服一审判决已向最高人民法院提起上诉,关于涉案专利无效决定的行政诉讼以及其他相关专利和商业秘密诉讼仍在进行中。
查看详情
山东华鲁恒升化工股份有限公司(以下简称“华鲁恒升”)是一家以化肥、化工、热电、气体为主营业务的公司,于2002年6月在上海证券交易所挂牌上市(股票代码600426)。7月1日,华鲁恒升发布公告称,2016年底,四川金象赛瑞化工股份有限公司(以下简称“金象赛瑞”)、北京烨晶科技有限公司(以下简称“烨晶科技”)以专利侵权为由起诉华鲁恒升、宁波市化工研究设计院有限公司(以下简称“宁波化工院”)、宁波远东化工集团有限公司(以下简称“远东集团”)和自然人尹明大(金象赛瑞原总工程师),涉案专利为第ZL201110108644.9号、第ZL201010216437.0号发明专利,两原告诉称四被告共同合作实施三聚氰胺项目的工程设计、制造、施工,并共同合作使用加压气相淬冷法工艺方法、组合式换热器及流化床反应器设备,侵犯了金象赛瑞发明专利专用权,给金象赛瑞造成了侵权损害。近日,广东省高级人民法院一审判决华鲁恒升立即停止侵犯金象赛瑞及其子公司烨晶科技拥有的三聚氰胺生产方法专利权,并赔偿原告经济损失及合理维权费用共计8000万元。 涉案专利主要涉及节能节资型气相淬冷法蜜胺生产系统及其工艺和组合式换热器及流化床反应器,都是加压气相淬冷法三聚氰胺生产相关技术。据金象赛瑞方面报道,涉案专利是由金象赛瑞联合烨晶科技的技术团队投入近亿元,历时10余年研发成功,目前在三聚氰胺生产技术上仍属于较高水平。 在该案的审理过程中,原告主张,华鲁恒升向有关安监部门提交备案的《安评报告》、《设计专篇》记载内容客观反映了涉案三聚氰胺项目实施的技术方案,可以认定四被告侵犯其专利权。华鲁恒升认为,记载的内容与其三聚氰胺项目实施的技术方案不同,三聚氰胺项目有关技术方案是其商业秘密,在庭审中明确表示拒绝进行现场勘验。法院依法到华鲁恒升厂区进行证据保全时,华鲁恒升采取多种手段妨碍法院工作人员执行公务,拒绝其进入项目现场,该行为被法院判定严重妨害民事诉讼,决定处罚80万元。证据保全是民事诉讼中的一项重要制度。在保全的证据范围涉及商业秘密的情况下,相关权利人可请求采取合理保密措施,华鲁恒升拒绝法院现场证据保全的行为,会对自己产生不利的影响。 华鲁恒升还在公告中称,在2011年10月其与宁波化工研究院、宁波远东共同签订合同,约定宁波化工研究院和宁波远东保证其提供的一切专有技术及相关技术资料系合法持有者,如果发生第三方指控华鲁恒升的项目侵权,由宁波这两家公司负责交涉并承担全部责任,8000万的判赔和80万的处罚最终有谁承担将会对华鲁恒升的经营活动产生重要的影响。目前华鲁恒升不服一审判决已向最高人民法院提起上诉,关于涉案专利无效决定的行政诉讼以及其他相关专利和商业秘密诉讼仍在进行中。
QWO, the First FDA Approved Injection Therapy for Cellulite
QWO, the First FDA Approved Injection Therapy for Cellulite
On July6,U.S.FoodandDrugAdministration(FDA)approvedEndoGlobalAestheticsLimited’sQwo™forthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecelluliteinthebuttocksofadultwomen.QWOisthefirstFDA-approvedinjectabletreatmentforc
查看详情
On July6,U.S.FoodandDrugAdministration(FDA)approvedEndoGlobalAestheticsLimited’sQwo™forthetreatmentofmoderatetoseverecelluliteinthebuttocksofadultwomen.QWOisthefirstFDA-approvedinjectabletreatmentforc
Overview of Patent Battle Between Wangsu and BaishanCloud
Overview of Patent Battle Between Wangsu and BaishanCloud
OnJune13th,CBInsights,aworld-renownedmarketresearchinstitute,releasedthe"China’sEdgeComputingDrivingForces2020"report,whichanalyzedChina'scloudedgecollaborativedevelopmentprocessandselected27companies
查看详情
OnJune13th,CBInsights,aworld-renownedmarketresearchinstitute,releasedthe"China’sEdgeComputingDrivingForces2020"report,whichanalyzedChina'scloudedgecollaborativedevelopmentprocessandselected27companies
网宿科技和白山云科技发起专利战,CDN行业暗流涌动!
网宿科技和白山云科技发起专利战,CDN行业暗流涌动!
6月13日,全球知名市场研究机构CBInsights发布了《中国边缘计算推动力2020》报告,该报告分析了中国云边协同发展进程并评选出27家推动中国边缘计算发展的公司。边缘计算以云计算,具有低时延、高效率、安全性、智能化的优势。在该报告选出的5家边缘云企业中,网宿科技股份有限公司(以下简称“网宿科技”)和贵州白山云科技股份有限公司(以下简称“白云山科技”)位列其中,作为CDN行业的佼佼者,两家科技
查看详情
6月13日,全球知名市场研究机构CBInsights发布了《中国边缘计算推动力2020》报告,该报告分析了中国云边协同发展进程并评选出27家推动中国边缘计算发展的公司。边缘计算以云计算,具有低时延、高效率、安全性、智能化的优势。在该报告选出的5家边缘云企业中,网宿科技股份有限公司(以下简称“网宿科技”)和贵州白山云科技股份有限公司(以下简称“白云山科技”)位列其中,作为CDN行业的佼佼者,两家科技
上一页
1
2
...
79

CONTACT

电话:+86 25 56673162 
E-Mail:service@chinaipic.com
地址:江苏省南京市江北新区江淼路88号腾飞大厦B座20层2001

公众号二维码

扫一扫,关注我们公众号

版权所有 © 南京华讯知识产权顾问有限公司      备案号:苏ICP备15002104号-1      网站建设:中企动力  南京